<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.11.5 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:58:03 GMT--><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><title>LJ CEO Blog</title><link>http://www.legacyj.com/lj-ceo-blog/</link><description></description><lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:53:59 +0000</lastBuildDate><copyright></copyright><language>en-US</language><generator>Squarespace Site Server v5.11.5 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</generator><item><title>thu blog test</title><dc:creator>Daniel Myers</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:53:59 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.legacyj.com/lj-ceo-blog/2010/3/25/thu-blog-test.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">350867:5263757:7125393</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>In the course of preparing the re-launch of the company, we have changedalmost every aspect of how we use our technology to solve Cobolmodernization issues.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.legacyj.com/lj-ceo-blog/rss-comments-entry-7125393.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>2nd thoughts...</title><dc:creator>Daniel Myers</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 08:04:48 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.legacyj.com/lj-ceo-blog/2009/12/3/2nd-thoughts.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">350867:5263757:5977004</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>As the recently appointed CEO for LegacyJ -- the 10-year "new" name for Synkronix -- I have a variety of facts that may be of value to your readers. Our architect, Brian Sullivan, took the bold step in 1995 to conclude that the object-oriented profile of Sun's new Java language -- and Sun's backing -- would create the environment needed to move old Cobol applications "seamlessly"... All you had to do was create a translation engine significantly in advance of the introduction of J2EE, most of JVM, most of why you could verify that this was, indeed, an outstanding selection -- not a wild-eyed graduate degree programmer's mistake...<br /><br />Still, it was 5+ years before Java was close to becoming the standard it is today.&nbsp; <br /><br /></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.legacyj.com/lj-ceo-blog/rss-comments-entry-5977004.xml</wfw:commentRss></item></channel></rss>